But groups that would normally defend late term abortions said that is
not what they consider the Gosnell case to be about. These groups
consider the trial to be about illegal abortions performed under
dangerous circumstances.
"The fact that he wasn't providing care later and wasn't ensuring fetal
demise and not operating under any established standards of care and
outside of the law is the problem in this case, and not indicative of
the high quality care available across the country," Saporta said.
"This is why we have to keep abortion practices available as medical
procedures, so that they are safe and legal between a woman and her
doctor," Hague said.
Article Here
Yeah. After all, this is why Holland wanted to legalize prostitution. It's going to be done, so let's keep it "safe and legal" between the brothel and its men. We see the good that has done, right?
Sure.
We find that women are valued in the red-light district, true?
Lives are held in high regard and women are compensated fairly.
They feel strong and empowered, right?
Sure.
Just ask their government officials about the rise in crime.
Ask the ladies how they got to that brothel and how they feel about their current type of employment.
What a ridiculous twist of events.
What a sweeping away of the horrors committed by a "doctor."
I also enjoy how we use the word "care" now.
You know I care because I will kill you.
Old, young, just as long as you are feeble.
Care for whom?
The lady will be left with shattered pieces of life and emotions.
The baby will be dead.
And the doctor will be waiting for the unrealized consequences.
What is life?
We don't know, but we know we have power to control it.
...As long as we twist and deceive the masses, of course...
(And shall I do this?! I shall. The link I was questioning, I link to: Pro-Life Home)
No comments:
Post a Comment